affirming denial of motion to compel the DOC to recalculate defendant's good time credit because writ of mandamus was proper vehicle for claim
Summary of this case from Smith v. StateNo. 209, 2009.
September 28, 2009.
Superior Cr 0803007621.
Decisions Without Published AFFIRMED.
affirming denial of motion to compel the DOC to recalculate defendant's good time credit because writ of mandamus was proper vehicle for claim
Summary of this case from Smith v. Stateaffirming denial of motion to compel the DOC to recalculate defendant's good time credit because writ of mandamus was proper vehicle
Summary of this case from Benge v. Stateaffirming denial of motion to compel the DOC to recalculate defendant's good time credit because writ of mandamus was proper vehicle
Summary of this case from Benge v. StateFull title:Hawkes v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Sep 28, 2009
Hawkes v. State, 2009 WL 3087271, at *1 (Del. Sept. 28, 2009). (15) Good time consists of two types of…
Smith v. StateFirst, a petition for a writ of mandamus, not a motion for sentence review, was the proper procedural vehicle…