Summary
In Haskel v. 60 West Fifty-third St. Corp. (231 App. Div. 800), affirming the Appellate Term and the Municipal Court (138 Misc. 595), a similar conclusion was reached where it was held that the intermingling of the security by the landlord with his own funds was not a conversion, there being no explicit agreement forbidding such use.
Summary of this case from Levinson v. ShapiroOpinion
December, 1930.
Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ.
Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion.