holding that, under what is now Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), if the date of receipt of the right to sue notice is unknown or disputed, the ninety-day period begins to run three days after the mailing date
Summary of this case from Bolden v. S.C. Dep't of Disabilities & Special NeedsNos. 89-2172, 89-2174.
November 21, 1990.
E.D.N.C., 710 F.Supp. 164.
AFFIRMED
holding that, under what is now Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), if the date of receipt of the right to sue notice is unknown or disputed, the ninety-day period begins to run three days after the mailing date
Summary of this case from Bolden v. S.C. Dep't of Disabilities & Special Needsdiscussing predecessor rule, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e)
Summary of this case from Artis v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.discussing predecessor rule, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e)
Summary of this case from Artis v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.Full title:Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Nov 21, 1990
As an initial matter, the Court notes that the operative date for beginning the 90 days is not the date a…
Whitesell v. Town of Morrisville" Personnel Policy, Art. I, § 1. He also admits that the town's Personnel Policy "was not adopted by…