Summary
adopting Restatement (Second) Conflicts of Law § 187
Summary of this case from Kellen Co., Inc. v. Calphalon Corp.Opinion
No. 84-7973.
March 5, 1985.
S.D.N.Y., 597 F.Supp. 1014.
DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS
AFFIRMED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 5, 1985
762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)
Summaries of
Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 5, 1985
762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)
adopting Restatement (Second) Conflicts of Law § 187
Summary of this case from Kellen Co., Inc. v. Calphalon Corp.dismissing deliberate indifference claim where there was no allegation that "the treatment prescribed was contrary to applicable medical standards"
Summary of this case from Lockhart v. SempleCase details for
Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.
Case Details
Full title:Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Mar 5, 1985
Citations
762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)
Citing Cases
TGG Ultimate Holdings, Inc. v. Hollett
In deciding whether the parties' choice-of-law provision is enforceable, New York follows the "substantial…
Mobil Chemical Co. v. Blount Bros. Corp.Blount has overlooked cases that involve a general contractor's liability for acceleration damages. See,…