From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2015
164 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

granting relief where the State conceded that "convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm violate double jeopardy because they were subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm"

Summary of this case from Tambriz-Ramirez v. State

Opinion

No. 5D14–624.

2015-05-22

Leon D. HANKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy , Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Roger J. Mcdonald, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Leon Hankins timely appeals his judgment and sentences for attempted first-degree murder with a firearm, burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm, arson of a dwelling, aggravated battery with a firearm, and aggravated assault with a firearm. He argues his convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm violate double jeopardy because they were subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm. The State properly concedes error. See McGhee v. State, 133 So.3d 1137, 1138–39 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (reversing conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm because it was subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery while armed with a firearm where offenses involved the same victim and occurred in the same incident); Farrier v. State, 145 So.3d 199, 199–200 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (“[reversing] both convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm because they were subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm.”) We, therefore, reverse the convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm and remand to the trial court for entry of a corrected judgment. McGee, 133 So.3d at 1139. The remaining convictions are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED TO CORRECT JUDGMENT.

TORPY, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hankins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2015
164 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

granting relief where the State conceded that "convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm violate double jeopardy because they were subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm"

Summary of this case from Tambriz-Ramirez v. State

granting relief where the State conceded that "convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm violate double jeopardy because they were subsumed into the greater offense of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm"

Summary of this case from Tambriz-Ramirez v. State
Case details for

Hankins v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEON D. HANKINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 22, 2015

Citations

164 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Tambriz-Ramirez v. State

We have for review Tambriz-Ramirez v. State , 213 So.3d 920, 923-25 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), in which the Fourth…

Dykes v. State

In his amended rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, in grounds III and V, Dykes contends that…