Summary
holding that the plaintiff stated a viable claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1692f based on the defendant's attempt to collect compound interest in violation of Missouri's prejudgment interest statute
Summary of this case from Klein v. Affiliated Grp., Inc.Opinion
No: 15-1932
12-27-2016
Daniel HANEY, Appellant v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. and Gamache & Myers, P.C., Appellees
Jeremy A. Gogel, THE GOGEL LAW FIRM, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Joshua C. Dickinson, Shilee T. Mullin, SPENCER & FANE, Omaha, NE, Patrick Thomas McLaughlin, SPENCER & FANE, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant–Appellee Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. Donald A. Horowitz, GAMACHE & MYERS, Saint Louis, MO, for Gamache & Myers, P.C.
Jeremy A. Gogel, THE GOGEL LAW FIRM, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff–Appellant.
Joshua C. Dickinson, Shilee T. Mullin, SPENCER & FANE, Omaha, NE, Patrick Thomas McLaughlin, SPENCER & FANE, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant–Appellee Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.
Donald A. Horowitz, GAMACHE & MYERS, Saint Louis, MO, for Gamache & Myers, P.C.
ORDER
In response to the petition for rehearing filed October 19, 2016, the opinion filed September 21, 2016, is vacated and an amended opinion is substituted and filed. The petition for panel rehearing is otherwise denied.
The petition for en banc rehearing is denied as moot.