From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall. v. Watson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 27, 2007
259 F. App'x 599 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6758.

Submitted: December 20, 2007.

Decided: December 27, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03110-RBH).

Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Vincent John Hall appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Watson, No. 6:06-cv-03110-RBH, 2007 WL 1447755 (D.S.C. May 11, 2007). Hall's motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hall. v. Watson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 27, 2007
259 F. App'x 599 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Hall. v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James David WATSON; Tracy…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 27, 2007

Citations

259 F. App'x 599 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bradshaw v. Carson

See, e.g, Dillberg v. Cty. of Kitsap, 76 Fed.Appx. 792, 797 (9th Cir. 2003) (stating a complaining witness is…