From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guntner v. Wofford Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 15, 1931
137 So. 27 (Ala. 1931)

Summary

In Guntner v. Wofford Co., 223 Ala. 420, 137 So. 27: "The statute gives no right of appeal, and the remedy for review is by application to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the rendition of the judgment by the circuit court for the writ of certiorari."

Summary of this case from Birmingham Clay Products Co. v. White

Opinion

4 Div. 577.

October 15, 1931.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coffee County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

Harry Adams, of Enterprise, for appellant.

Farmer, Merrill Farmer, of Dothan, and Huey Huey, of Enterprise, for appellee.

In view of the decision, it is not necessary that briefs be here set out.


This action was brought under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.), and there was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. The statute gives no right of appeal, and the remedy for review is by application to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the rendition of the judgment by the circuit court for the writ of certiorari. Sections 7571 and 7578 of the Code of 1923; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803; Ex parte National Pipe Co., 213 Ala. 605, 105 So. 693.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

THOMAS, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guntner v. Wofford Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 15, 1931
137 So. 27 (Ala. 1931)

In Guntner v. Wofford Co., 223 Ala. 420, 137 So. 27: "The statute gives no right of appeal, and the remedy for review is by application to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the rendition of the judgment by the circuit court for the writ of certiorari."

Summary of this case from Birmingham Clay Products Co. v. White
Case details for

Guntner v. Wofford Co.

Case Details

Full title:GUNTNER v. WOFFORD CO

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 15, 1931

Citations

137 So. 27 (Ala. 1931)
223 Ala. 420

Citing Cases

Faddis v. Woodward Iron Company

The only method of review open to an aggrieved party in a workmen's compensation case is by certiorari under…

Ex Parte Woodward Iron Company

Brobston Brobston, Bessemer, and Richard L. Jones, Birmingham, for respondent. In a Workmen's Compensation…