holding that under Feldman (9th Cir. 1992), lower courts may not review a specific state court decision interpreting a state court rule
Summary of this case from Pedrina v. ChunNo. 92-415.
November 30, 1992.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 972 F. 2d 1353.
holding that under Feldman (9th Cir. 1992), lower courts may not review a specific state court decision interpreting a state court rule
Summary of this case from Pedrina v. Chunfinding that a claim of conspiratorial conduct under Sherman Act for price fixing may be established through circumstantial evidence
Summary of this case from St. of Ohio Montgomery v. Trauth Dairydenying qualified immunity to defendants who failed to cut detainee down when he was discovered hanging in his cell
Summary of this case from HARE v. CITY OF CORINTH, MSaffirming dismissal of amended complaint because plaintiff "did not allege a relevant product market which [defendant] was capable of monopolizing, attempting to, or conspiring to monopolize"
Summary of this case from Davies v. Genesis Medical Centeraffirming dismissal of amended complaint because plaintiff "did not allege a relevant product market which was capable of monopolizing, attempting to, or conspiring to monopolize"
Summary of this case from Advocacy Organization v. Mercy Health Servicesnoting that "the word 'procedural' in section 1447(c) refers to 'any defect that does not go to the question of whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court . . . .'
Summary of this case from Gutierrez v. La Joya Indep. Sch. Dist.Full title:GULF CONTRACTING, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 30, 1992
See TVComm. Network, Inc. v. Turner Network Tel., Inc., 964 F.2d 1022, 1028 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506…
U.S. v. Rochester Gas and Elec. Corp.First, it contends that because the University was neither a competitor, nor a potential competitor in the…