From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guilford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 14, 1998
715 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

In Guilford, supra, this court noted that that was Guilford's fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition concerning that criminal case.

Summary of this case from Guilford v. State

Opinion

No. 98-1912

August 14, 1998

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County; Tonya Rainwater, Judge.

Ned Guilford, Madison, pro se

No Appearance for Appellee.


We affirm the lower court's denial of the defendant's most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant's fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So.2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O'Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla. 1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Guilford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 14, 1998
715 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

In Guilford, supra, this court noted that that was Guilford's fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition concerning that criminal case.

Summary of this case from Guilford v. State
Case details for

Guilford v. State

Case Details

Full title:NED GUILFORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 14, 1998

Citations

715 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Guilford v. State

All of the issues raised in Guilford's petition below could or should have been raised in a direct appeal or…