From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 21, 2008
File No. 2:05 CV 126 (D. Vt. Oct. 21, 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

dismissing deliberate indifference claim on summary judgment where plaintiff who had not received psychological medication for a few days alleged that he suffered "physical symptoms of withdrawal" but failed to adduce evidence of any long-term harm

Summary of this case from Blanch v. Schiff
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

File No. 2:05 CV 126.

October 21, 2008

ORDER

WILLIAM SESSIONS III, District Judge

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed October 1, 2008. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The defendants' motions for summary judgment (Papers 46 and 53) are GRANTED.

This case is DISMISSED.

Summaries of

Griffith v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 21, 2008
File No. 2:05 CV 126 (D. Vt. Oct. 21, 2008)

dismissing deliberate indifference claim on summary judgment where plaintiff who had not received psychological medication for a few days alleged that he suffered "physical symptoms of withdrawal" but failed to adduce evidence of any long-term harm

Summary of this case from Blanch v. Schiff

In Griffith v. Hofmann, 2008 WL 4682690, at *7 (D. Vt. Oct. 21, 2008), the prisoner complained that his Ramadan meals were smaller portions than usual and were cold.

Summary of this case from Winston v. Edwards

In Griffith v. Hofmann, 2008 WL 4682690, at *7 (D. Vt. Oct. 21, 2008), the prisoner complained that his Ramadan meals were smaller portions than usual and were cold.

Summary of this case from Tompkins v. Moritz

In Griffith v. Hofmann, No. 2:05CV126, 2008 WL 4682690 (D.Vt. Oct. 21, 2008), the prisoner complained that during Ramadan, his meals were smaller than usual and they were cold. The Court however dismissed his claim, stating that he had made no showing that either portion size or temperature was a requisite part of the Ramadan meal and that his religious practice had not been 'substantially burdened.

Summary of this case from Blake v. Cooper
Case details for

Griffith v. Hofmann

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Griffith, Plaintiff, v. Robert Hofmann, Vermont Department of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

File No. 2:05 CV 126 (D. Vt. Oct. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

Winston v. Edwards

Similarly, in Crump v. Best, 2012 WL 1056806, *8 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2012), the Court found that having to…

Tompkins v. Moritz

Similarly, in Crump v. Best, 2012 WL 1056806, *8 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2012), the Court found that having to…

7 Citing Cases