From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenleaf Textile v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 12, 1933
65 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1933)

Summary

In Greenleaf Textile Corp. v. Commissioner, 26 B.T.A. 737, affirmed 2 Cir., 65 F.2d 1017, Commissioner v. Abramson, 2 Cir., 124 F.2d 416, and Commissioner v. McCarthy, 7 Cir., 129 F.2d 84, the court found that the taxpayer had failed to prove the worthlessness of his property or any definite act of abandonment in the tax year so that a retention of title by the taxpayer assumed real importance.

Summary of this case from Helvering v. Gordon

Opinion

No. 389.

June 12, 1933.

Appeal from the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

On petition for review of decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Benjamin Mahler, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Sewall Key and Carlton Fox, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and William E. Davis, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Greenleaf Textile v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 12, 1933
65 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1933)

In Greenleaf Textile Corp. v. Commissioner, 26 B.T.A. 737, affirmed 2 Cir., 65 F.2d 1017, Commissioner v. Abramson, 2 Cir., 124 F.2d 416, and Commissioner v. McCarthy, 7 Cir., 129 F.2d 84, the court found that the taxpayer had failed to prove the worthlessness of his property or any definite act of abandonment in the tax year so that a retention of title by the taxpayer assumed real importance.

Summary of this case from Helvering v. Gordon
Case details for

Greenleaf Textile v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:GREENLEAF TEXTILE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 12, 1933

Citations

65 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1933)

Citing Cases

Welch Holding Co. v. Galloway

The plaintiff corporation, during the years 1929 and 1930, was merely a conduit or intermediary through which…

United States v. Sentinel Oil Co.

Neither of those conditions existed here. In Coalinga-Mohawk Oil Company v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1933, 64…