From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenfield v. Cheek

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 23, 1979
122 Ariz. 57 (Ariz. 1979)

Summary

In Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. 57, 593 P.2d 280 (1979) the Arizona Supreme Court approved and adopted the decision of Division One of this court in Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. 70, 593 P.2d 293 (App. 1978) and held that an intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud is a prerequisite to a claim for relief under A.R.S. Sec. 44-1991(2).

Summary of this case from State v. Gunnison

Opinion

No. 14074-PR.

March 23, 1979.

Appeal from Superior Court, Maricopa County, Cause No. C-293719; Warren L. McCarthy, Judge.

Dushoff Sacks by David C. Tierney, Phoenix, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Filipe K. Johannson, Phoenix, and Richard A. Nulle, Scottsdale, for appellee and cross-appellant.


REVERSED AND REMANDED.


The petition for review is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. App. 70, 593 P.2d 293 (1978) is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. Anything to the contrary in Washington National Corp. v. Thomas, 117 Ariz. 95, 570 P.2d 1268 (App. 1977) and Baker v. Walston Co., Inc., 7 Ariz. App. 590, 442 P.2d 148 (1968) is hereby disapproved.

STRUCKMEYER, V.C.J., and HAYS, HOLOHAN and GORDON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Greenfield v. Cheek

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 23, 1979
122 Ariz. 57 (Ariz. 1979)

In Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. 57, 593 P.2d 280 (1979) the Arizona Supreme Court approved and adopted the decision of Division One of this court in Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. 70, 593 P.2d 293 (App. 1978) and held that an intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud is a prerequisite to a claim for relief under A.R.S. Sec. 44-1991(2).

Summary of this case from State v. Gunnison
Case details for

Greenfield v. Cheek

Case Details

Full title:Steven H. GREENFIELD, Burton J. Greenfield and Helen P. Greenfield, his…

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Mar 23, 1979

Citations

122 Ariz. 57 (Ariz. 1979)
593 P.2d 280

Citing Cases

Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse

On motion for rehearing, the supreme court realized that it had overlooked its recent approval of a contrary…

Grand v. Nacchio

Moreover, Arizona courts have viewed § 44-2001 as permitting a plaintiff to elect a remedy rather than as…