holding agents for the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services were entitled to summary judgment on all claims naming them in their official capacities
Summary of this case from Tice v. AdgerNo. 95-1741
April 17, 1996.
Appeal from the D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
holding agents for the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services were entitled to summary judgment on all claims naming them in their official capacities
Summary of this case from Tice v. Adgerfinding that a South Carolina court's exercising jurisdiction over a Japanese corporation would offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice because of language and cultural barriers and the expense of traveling to South Carolina from Japan to defend the suit
Summary of this case from Arthur v. SternFull title:Gray v. Riso Kagaku Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Apr 17, 1996
Gamache v. Cavanaugh, 82 F.3d 410, 1996 WL 174623, at *1 (4th Cir. 1996); see also Gray v. Laws, 51…
Fitzhenry v. USHealth Grp., Inc."[T]he mere fact that [a corporation's] subsidiaries do business in South Carolina does not confer personal…