Summary
finding that, because the petitioner before the hearing received from the incident report adequate notice of the factual basis for his disciplinary charge, the DHO's determination that the petitioner violated Prohibited Act Code 213A rather than Code 212 or 307 did not violate due process
Summary of this case from Alvarez v. Warden, FCC ColemanOpinion
Case No. CV 12-04407 CJC (AN)
11-20-2012
HAROLD GRAFF, Petitioner, v. LINDA SANDERS, Respondent.
JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
________
CORMAC J. CARNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE