holding that no recovery of profits was available to plaintiff in addition to damages, as that would result in overcompensation
Summary of this case from Variety Stores, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.No. 77-737.
January 24, 1978, OCTOBER TERM, 1977.
DISMISSALS UNDER RULE 60
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 60. Reported below: 561 F. 2d 1365.
holding that no recovery of profits was available to plaintiff in addition to damages, as that would result in overcompensation
Summary of this case from Variety Stores, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.affirming sub. nom. Wright v. Enomoto (U.S.D.C., N.D., Calif.) 462 F. Supp. 397
Summary of this case from Crawford v. Dermittapproving district court's finding of a liberty interest in state rules, practices and procedures
Summary of this case from Parker v. CorrothersIn Enomoto, a three-judge District Court held that an administrative regulation of the California Department of Corrections was sufficient to create an entitlement that prisoners would not be placed in segregation absent a specified factual predicate.
Summary of this case from Arsberry v. Sielaffestablishing seventy-two hour period for segregation pending disciplinary hearing
Summary of this case from Clark v. BrewerFull title:GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. v. BIG O TIRE DEALERS, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 24, 1978
The district court declined to adopt the magistrate's recommendations and denied the defendants' motion…
Government of Virgin Islands v. MartinezUnited States v. Alexander, 748 F.2d 185, 193 (4th Cir. 1984). As this Court held in United States v.…