Summary
holding plaintiff's § 1983 action is barred by North Carolina statute of limitations and noting "Plaintiff fails to cite any authority for his argument that his prosecution of a similar civil case along a parallel track in state court somehow 'tolls' the statute of limitations for purposes of his § 1983 action in federal court."
Summary of this case from Judge v. HayesOpinion
No. 12-7810
02-25-2013
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTEN DEGABRIELLE SIMMONS, Defendant - Appellee.
Lance Adam Goldman, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-ct-03118-F) Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lance Adam Goldman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lance Adam Goldman appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Goldman v. Simmons, No. 5:12-ct-03118-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED