Opinion
No. 05-15282.
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2007.
Filed February 14, 2007.
Teresa S. Renaker, Esq., Lewis Feinberg Renaker Jackson, PC, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Kim Zeldin, Esq., Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstreif, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-O4-01917-CRB.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order granting the motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Supreme Court's recent decision in Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Med. Servs., Inc., ___ U.S.___, 126 S.Ct. 1869, 1875, 164 L.Ed.2d 612 (2006), does not undermine the district court's reasoning and Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005), supports it.
AFFIRMED.