From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glover v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Sep 3, 2013
No. 5:13CV00065-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2013)

Summary

finding that, where prison doctor determined no treatment was necessary, "decision to deny a second opinion does not create a cognizable constitutional violation"

Summary of this case from Aaron v. Hobbs

Opinion

No. 5:13CV00065-SWW-JJV

09-03-2013

ALVIN GLOVER, ADC #601517 Plaintiff, v. RAY HOBBS; et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Glover v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Sep 3, 2013
No. 5:13CV00065-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2013)

finding that, where prison doctor determined no treatment was necessary, "decision to deny a second opinion does not create a cognizable constitutional violation"

Summary of this case from Aaron v. Hobbs
Case details for

Glover v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN GLOVER, ADC #601517 Plaintiff, v. RAY HOBBS; et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

No. 5:13CV00065-SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Aaron v. Hobbs

Mr. Aaron grieved that Dr. Mahmaad was "not correcting the problem," but the Court determines that Ms. Kelley…