From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 23, 1960
27 Misc. 2d 325 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Summary

In Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc., 27 Misc.2d 325, 207 N.Y.S.2d 307 (1960), the court ordered the examination to be made in the district where the court sat, in order that the physician would be subject to the jurisdiction of the court, in the event that his testimony was needed at trial.

Summary of this case from Costanza v. Monty

Opinion

June 23, 1960

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, LAWRENCE J. PELTIN, J.

Theodore T. Weiser and Milton Pfeffer for appellant.

Italo H. Ablondi and Richard F. Mele for respondent.


Since the action is pending in New York State, the forum chosen by the plaintiff, it was improvident exercise of discretion to direct his physical examination by a Connecticut physician. The examination should be made by a physician licensed in New York who is subject to the jurisdiction of the City Court of the City of New York, so that he will be available to testify at the trial if need be. Such physician shall be either the physician already designated by the defendant or such other physician as the court below may in its discretion appoint. The examination shall proceed at such time and place as may be agreed upon by the parties, or in the event of their inability to agree, at such time and place, including Bridgeport, as the court below may in its discretion direct.

The order so far as appealed from should be modified, without costs, and motion remitted to the court below for further disposition in accordance with the foregoing.

Concur — STEUER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ.

Order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 23, 1960
27 Misc. 2d 325 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

In Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc., 27 Misc.2d 325, 207 N.Y.S.2d 307 (1960), the court ordered the examination to be made in the district where the court sat, in order that the physician would be subject to the jurisdiction of the court, in the event that his testimony was needed at trial.

Summary of this case from Costanza v. Monty
Case details for

Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST GENEVOSE, Respondent, v. WHEATALITY BAKERY, INC., Appellant, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1960

Citations

27 Misc. 2d 325 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
207 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

Williams v. Safford RV LLC

Courts have historically ordered the examination to take place in the district where the court sits so that…

Costanza v. Monty

         The plaintiff in the case at bar also argues that she will be financially burdened if she must…