PER CURIAM

On Appeal from the 113th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2018-14362

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed July 27, 2018, that does not dispose of all the parties. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Appellant argues that this interlocutory appeal is authorized by statute because the trial court signed an order granting a motion to dismiss by certain defendants based on governmental immunity. We disagree because the record shows the trial court's order of partial dismissal granted these defendants' motion to dismiss under Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a. There is no statute authorizing an interlocutory appeal from such an order.

On September 6, 2018 notification was transmitted to the parties of this court's intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before September 17, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response was filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Wise.