From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 18, 2018
138 S. Ct. 2649 (2018)

Summary

presenting question of whether "the 'presumption of prejudice' recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, appl[ies] where a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal but trial counsel decides not to do so because the defendant's plea agreement included an appeal waiver"

Summary of this case from Martin v. United States

Opinion

No. 17–1026.

06-18-2018

Gilberto GARZA, Jr., petitioner, v. IDAHO.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho granted.


Summaries of

Garza v. Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 18, 2018
138 S. Ct. 2649 (2018)

presenting question of whether "the 'presumption of prejudice' recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, appl[ies] where a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal but trial counsel decides not to do so because the defendant's plea agreement included an appeal waiver"

Summary of this case from Martin v. United States
Case details for

Garza v. Idaho

Case Details

Full title:Gilberto GARZA, Jr., petitioner, v. IDAHO.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jun 18, 2018

Citations

138 S. Ct. 2649 (2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Martinez

In a criminal case, a lawyer who is instructed to file a notice of appeal must file it, even if the defendant…

Stolkner v. United States

The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a case that presents the following question: "Does the…