holding that § 922(g) violates the Second Amendment, as applied to a particular nonviolent felon

finding § 922(g) unconstitutional as applied to defendant whose prior felony conviction was making a false statement to receive food stamps

vacating the judgment in Range

vacating and remanding, in light of Rahimi, the Third Circuit's holding that the federal felon-in-possession law is unconstitutional as applied

vacating and remanding

vacating the Third Circuit's opinion in Range and remanding “for further consideration in light of United States v. Rahimi . . . .”

doubting that proposition

In Range, the government relied on historical dispossession statutes based on race and religion, the historical execution of persons with felonies, and historical forfeiture laws, but the Third Circuit rejected those as analogues because they were not “relevantly similar” to the felon-in-possession statute.