holding that an expert's opinion was methodologically unreliable because, among other things, it made the "significant error" of aggregating damage measurements that were, in fact, alternatives

concluding that employer's determination, based on numerous disciplinary notices, that plaintiff was "incapable of getting along with her fellow employees, was insubordinate to her superiors and was disruptive to customers and co-workers," satisfied employer's burden to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for plaintiffs termination

granting the defendant-manufacturer's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' design defect claim alleging that defendant's Winchester Black Talon hollow point bullets were "defectively designed in such a manner as to open into razor sharp edges and to severely rip through and mutilate body parts of the individual shot by such bullets," on the basis, inter alia, that plaintiff's failed to establish that the bullets were unsafe, unfit or unsuitable for their intended use within the meaning of the NJPLA since the bullets functioned precisely as intended

excluding proffered expert who "knew very little about [the relevant] industry" and "did not perform or review any market surveys or studies"

In Gaviria, the Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez considered a prisoner's habeas claim that federal authorities violated his rights under the Vienna Convention when, at the time of his arrest, agents never informed him of his right to contact a consular official.