Opinion
1:21-CV-01708
08-24-2022
DON FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
[REGARDING ECF NO. 12]
BENITA Y. PEARSON, JUDGE
On August 9, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued a Report recommending that the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiffs application for Supplemental Security Income be affirmed. See. ECF No. 12
The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(b)(2) . Failure to object within this time waives a party's right to appeal the district court's judgment. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Absent objection, a district court may adopt a magistrate judge's report without review. See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149.
In the instant case, objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by August 23, 2022. No party has not filed an Objection. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 12. The Commissioner's decision denying Supplemental Security Income is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.