Summary
holding that detention facility had a legitimate penological interest in prohibiting inmates in protective custody from attending religious services
Summary of this case from Hill v. Mgmt. Training Corp.Opinion
No. 1:12CV192-SA-DAS
07-29-2014
CHRISTOPHER M. FORTNER PLAINTIFF v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS
FINAL JUDGMENT
Having considered the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation should therefore be approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is ordered:
1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.
2. That all of the plaintiff's claims are without merit and are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
SO ORDERED, this, the 29th day of July, 2014.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE