From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 27, 1953
159 Tex. Crim. 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)

Summary

In Fite v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. 611, 259 S.W.2d 198, this Court held that the provisions of Article 3731a, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., were applicable to criminal cases.

Summary of this case from Hill v. State

Opinion

No. 26494.

June 27, 1953.

Appeal from the District Court, Eastlnd County.

L. R. Pearson, Ranger, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $150 and 30 days in jail.

The undisputed evidence shows that the appellant acted as the agent of the purchaser in buying the whisky, rather than as the seller of the whisky, as alleged in the information.

Such facts do not warrant the conviction for selling whisky. Harris v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 233 S.W.2d 123; Branch's P. C., Sec. 1248.

The state's attorney before this court confesses the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, for the reason stated.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.


Summaries of

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 27, 1953
159 Tex. Crim. 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)

In Fite v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. 611, 259 S.W.2d 198, this Court held that the provisions of Article 3731a, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., were applicable to criminal cases.

Summary of this case from Hill v. State
Case details for

Flores v. State

Case Details

Full title:FLORES v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 27, 1953

Citations

159 Tex. Crim. 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
259 S.W.2d 198

Citing Cases

Trussell v. State

Appellant contends that the court's refusal to accept the offense report in evidence was error. This Court…

Trujillo v. State

Page 880 Tex.Cr.R., 292 S.W.2d 114; Fite v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 611, 259 S.W.2d 198; Smith v. Riviere,…