From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flora v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 1993
619 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1993)

Summary

approving court of appeal's decision finding that erroneous instruction issue “did not attack the jurisdiction of the court, and were, therefore, merely grounds upon which to appeal”

Summary of this case from People v. S.X.M.

Opinion

No. 93-611

Submitted July 28, 1993 —

Decided October 13, 1993.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-93-9.

In a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed in the court of appeals, appellant, Mike Flora, alleged that he was convicted of aggravated murder and attempted kidnapping and sentenced to from thirty years to life imprisonment. He also alleged that a kidnapping instruction was given during the trial, which violated his constitutional rights and constituted judicial misconduct entitling him to be released pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus. The court of appeals dismissed the petition, finding that the issues raised did not attack the jurisdiction of the court, and were, therefore, merely grounds on which to appeal.

The cause is before the court upon an appeal as of right.

Mike Flora, pro se.


We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its decision.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flora v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 1993
619 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1993)

approving court of appeal's decision finding that erroneous instruction issue “did not attack the jurisdiction of the court, and were, therefore, merely grounds upon which to appeal”

Summary of this case from People v. S.X.M.

approving court of appeal's decision finding that erroneous instruction issue "did not attack the jurisdiction of the court, and were, therefore, merely grounds upon which to appeal"

Summary of this case from People, 11CA0398
Case details for

Flora v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:FLORA, APPELLANT, v. ROGERS, SUPT., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 13, 1993

Citations

619 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1993)
619 N.E.2d 690

Citing Cases

State v. Medlar

Thus, Medlar is being held by a judgment issued by a court that had jurisdiction, and habeas corpus will not…

State ex Rel. Richard v. Seidner

Richard apparently asserts that even assuming the propriety of the amended indictment or the ability of the…