Summary
explaining that, after Father filed for a temporary PFA order against Son, the parties entered into a consent agreement, which stated that a final PFA order would be entered if Son violated any of the terms of the consent agreement, and that the PFA action was continued for a period not to exceed three years
Summary of this case from Beck v. BeckOpinion
No. 892 WDA 2020
07-09-2021
Edwin C. FISCHL, Appellant v. Edwin M. FISCHL, Appellee
Non-Precedential Decision
See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing
Vacated in part. Remanded. Jurisdiction is relinquished.