From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finley v. Trans Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 24, 2017
17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017)

Summary

noting that absent a timely objection “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”

Summary of this case from Blonder v. Indep. Capital Recovery

Opinion

17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB)

10-24-2017

DANE EARL FINLEY JR., Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, EXPERIAN, EQUIFAX, Defendant.


ORDER :

On August 10, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom issued a report and recommendation (the "Report and Recommendation"), wherein she recommended that this Court dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 37(b)(2)(A)(v) for failure to comply with the Court's orders and for Plaintiff's abandonment of this action. (See R. & R., ECF No. 19.) Any written objections to the Report and Recommendation had to be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of the report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). No objections have been filed.

Where no objections to a report and recommendation have been filed, "the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Court orders and for his apparent abandonment of this lawsuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Dated: October 24, 2017

Brooklyn, New York

SO ORDERED:

/s/ LDH

LASHANN DEARCY HALL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Finley v. Trans Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 24, 2017
17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017)

noting that absent a timely objection “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”

Summary of this case from Blonder v. Indep. Capital Recovery
Case details for

Finley v. Trans Union

Case Details

Full title:DANE EARL FINLEY JR., Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, EXPERIAN, EQUIFAX…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 24, 2017

Citations

17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017)

Citing Cases

Zeng v. Parc Hotel LLC

Where no timely objections have been filed, "the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no…

Yun Jae Lee v. The Korea Cent. Daily News, Inc.

Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no…