From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finguerra v. Conn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Summary

In Finguerra v. Conn (280 A.D.2d 420 [1st Dept 2001]), cited by defendants, the court held that a defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's negligence claim where the plaintiff sustained injuries after diving into the shallow end of a swimming pool while intoxicated.

Summary of this case from MIRAMBEAUX v. 160/159 REALTY

Opinion

February 26, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered January 4, 2000, which denied the motions by defendants Summer Activities, Jetline Products, Dover Vinyl Products, and fourth-party defendant Cardinal Systems, for summary judgment dismissing, inter alia, plaintiff's complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motions granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of appellants dismissing the complaint and the fourth-party complaint and all claims against them.

Andrew B. Weiner, for plaintiff-respondent.

Loretta A. Redmond, James K. O'Sullivan, and Brendan T. Fitzpatrick, for defendants-appellants.

Paul Goodovitch, for fourth-party Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe, Friedman, JJ.


This court's prior determination (reported at 252 A.D.2d 463), rejecting plaintiff's negligence claim against the owners of a swimming pool, on the basis that plaintiff's own reckless conduct in consuming alcoholic beverages and then diving into a section of the pool where the water was not deep enough to safely support his dive, even though he was familiar with the pool and its contours, was the proximate cause of his injuries, bars plaintiff's product liability claims against the non-owner defendants (see, People v. Evans, 94 N.Y.2d 499, 502). Under both negligence and product liability theories, plaintiff's reckless conduct was the proximate cause of his injuries, regardless of defective products or the pool owners' failure to warn potential users of the varying depths of the pool (see, Campbell v. Muswim Pools, Inc., 147 A.D.2d 977, lv denied, 74 N.Y.2d 608; Belling v. Haugh's Pools Ltd., 126 A.D.2d 958, lv denied, 70 N.Y.2d 602).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Finguerra v. Conn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

In Finguerra v. Conn (280 A.D.2d 420 [1st Dept 2001]), cited by defendants, the court held that a defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's negligence claim where the plaintiff sustained injuries after diving into the shallow end of a swimming pool while intoxicated.

Summary of this case from MIRAMBEAUX v. 160/159 REALTY
Case details for

Finguerra v. Conn

Case Details

Full title:MARK FINGUERRA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN CONN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 497

Citing Cases

MIRAMBEAUX v. 160/159 REALTY

( Hargas Affirm. in Support of Defendants' Motion.) In Finguerra v. Conn ( 280 A.D.2d 420 [1st Dept 2001]),…

Brady v. Domino

ons of defendant's pool, i.e., where the shallow end started and ended. Under those circumstances, we…