From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-4233

Opinion filed July 16, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Terry D. Terrell, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Diane D. Starke, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant complains that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter an order of restitution, in the form of a civil judgment, after the maximum permissible probationary term for her offense had expired. The state responds that the trial court possessed the authority to enter the order pursuant to section 775.089(5), Florida Statutes. The applicable version of section 775.089(5) reads: "An order of restitution may be enforced by the state, or a victim named in the order to receive the restitution, in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action." § 775.089(5), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988) (emphasis added). We fail to see how this provision supports the state's position. Finding nothing in section 775.089, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), to support the proposition that the trial court possessed jurisdiction to enter a restitution order after the maximum permissible probationary term for appellant's offense had expired, we reverse, and remand with directions that the judgment be vacated.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Finch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Finch v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA JEANETTE FINCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 16, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Montes v. State

Accordingly, the trial court did not have the authority to enter a restitution order after the defendant's…