Summary
reasoning that "[t]he officer's affidavit vouching for the truth of his report does not render admissible the hearsay statements contained in the report"
Summary of this case from Najera v. Bernsohn & Fetner, LLCOpinion
No. 1539.
November 19, 2009.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered June 23, 2008, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Zeccola Selinger, LLC, Goshen (John S. Selinger of counsel), for appellant.
Burke, Lipton Gordon, White Plains (Brian D. Acard of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Nardelli, Catterson and DeGrasse, JJ.
The police accident report was inadmissible because it was made by an officer who did not witness the accident and it contains the hearsay, and presumably self-serving, statements of plaintiffs decedent as to the ultimate issue of fact ( Holliday v Hudson Armored Car Courier Serv., 301 AD2d 392, 396, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 100 NY2d 636; Kajoshaj v Greenspan, 88 AD2d 538, 539). The officer's affidavit vouching for the truth of his report does not render admissible the hearsay statements contained in the report.