From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faxas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 2008
975 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D08-246.

March 12, 2008. Rehearing Denied April 3, 2008.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Cynthia G. Imperato, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 92-17769 CF10A 93-11630 CF10A.

Juan Carlos Faxas, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to exhaust administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections, and thereafter, if unsatisfied with the results, to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the proper venue. See, e.g. Dandashi v. State, 956 So.2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (affirming trial court order denying motion for credit without prejudice to appellant to first exhaust his administrative remedies with DOC, and then file for mandamus in the trial court if necessary); King v. State, 665 So.2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Davis v. State, 943 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

FARMER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faxas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 2008
975 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Faxas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Juan Carlos FAXAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 3, 2008

Citations

975 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Cooper v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to exhaust all administrative remedies with the…