From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dandashi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
956 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D07-1297.

May 16, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Cynthia G. Imperato, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 1-14337 CF10A 3-2607 CF10A.

Mohamed Dandashi, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The defendant appeals an order denying his motion for clarification. In that motion, the defendant requested the trial court to require the Department of Corrections to give him proper credit for time served in jail. The trial court denied the motion because the defendant did not indicate that he had pursued his administrative remedy with the Department of Corrections. We affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to defendant's ability to first exhaust his administrative remedies and then file a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court, if necessary. See King v. State, 665 So.2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Affirmed.

FARMER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dandashi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
956 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Dandashi v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mohamed DANDASHI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

956 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Faxas v. State

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to exhaust administrative remedies with the Department of…