From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte S.D

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 31, 1992
602 So. 2d 1209 (Ala. 1992)

Summary

holding that a petition in a juvenile-delinquency case need not be signed and filed by the intake officer in order to give the juvenile court subject-matter jurisdiction over the petition

Summary of this case from W.T.H. v. M.M.M

Opinion

1901695.

July 31, 1992.

Petition for writ for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals (CR 89-1406). Appeal from the Talladega Juvenile Court, Nos. JU-90-10,183, JU-90-10,223 and JU-90-10,224, Tommy Dobson, District Judge.

Arthur Parker of Arthur Parker, Atty. Professional Ass'n, Birmingham, for petitioner.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Robin Blevins, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 602 So.2d 1206.


We affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and we specifically approve the rationale of that court's opinion, which was authored by Judge Bowen.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte S.D

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 31, 1992
602 So. 2d 1209 (Ala. 1992)

holding that a petition in a juvenile-delinquency case need not be signed and filed by the intake officer in order to give the juvenile court subject-matter jurisdiction over the petition

Summary of this case from W.T.H. v. M.M.M
Case details for

Ex Parte S.D

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte S.D. (Re S.D. v. State)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 31, 1992

Citations

602 So. 2d 1209 (Ala. 1992)

Citing Cases

W.T.H. v. M.M.M

In Ex parte Johnson, 474 So.2d 715 (Ala. 1985), the Alabama Supreme Court held that any interested party may…

Matter of F.W

Here, the mother herself, by verified petition, alleged the dependency of the children. See § 12-15-52, Ala.…