Opinion
Nos. 07-1844, 07-1845.
Submitted: January 9, 2008.
Decided: January 16, 2008.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00901-JAB; 1:06-cv-00902-JAB).
David K. Everson, Patricia M. Everson, Appellants Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Office of the Attorney General, Kaleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David K. and Patricia M. Everson appeal the district court's orders granting Respondents' motions to dismiss the Eversons' 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 (2000) claims. The district court found the Eversons' claims were barred by absolute judicial immunity, the Eleventh Amendment, the Rooker-Feldman abstention doctrine, and because they failed to state a federal claim. The Eversons challenge each of the district court's findings.
See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).
We have reviewed the record, the parties' informal briefs, and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Everson v. Eagles, No. 1:06-cv-00901-JAB (M.D.N.C. June 4, 2007); Everson v. Goodson, No. 1:06-cv-00902-JAB (M.D.N.C. June 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.