From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everitt v. Conklin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Everitt v. Conklin (90 N.Y. 645) one Copley, the plaintiff's assignor, agreed with defendant to purchase the defendant's farm, he agreeing to pay therefor, three months after the date of the agreement, $10,000, upon which the defendant was to convey free of incumbrance.

Summary of this case from Howarth v. Howarth
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued October 12, 1882

Decided October 24, 1882

H. Boardman Smith for appellant.

E.J. Baldwin for respondent.

FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except TRACY, J., taking no part, and RAPALLO, J absent.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Everitt v. Conklin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)

In Everitt v. Conklin (90 N.Y. 645) one Copley, the plaintiff's assignor, agreed with defendant to purchase the defendant's farm, he agreeing to pay therefor, three months after the date of the agreement, $10,000, upon which the defendant was to convey free of incumbrance.

Summary of this case from Howarth v. Howarth
Case details for

Everitt v. Conklin

Case Details

Full title:JACOB L. EVERITT, Respondent, v . JAMES R. CONKLIN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1882

Citations

90 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)

Citing Cases

Mutual Life Ins. v. McCurdy

In such case an alternative allegation is permissible, and plaintiff should not be required to elect in…

Mayo v. Knowlton

FN??a1. NOTE ON REQUIRING TO ELECT BETWEEN DIFFERENT GROUNDS OF RECOVERY ON THE SAME CLAIM.The increasing…

6 Citing Cases