From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eugster v. Littlewood

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2019
No. 18-35421 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-35421

03-19-2019

STEPHEN KERR EUGSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAULA LITTLEWOOD, Executive Director, WSBA, in her official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00392-TOR MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Thomas O. Rice, Chief Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Attorney Stephen Kerr Eugster appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his antitrust and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Eugster fails to address any of the grounds for dismissal and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court's order. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) ("[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant's opening brief."); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro se appellant's opening brief are waived).

Eugster's request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Eugster v. Littlewood

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2019
No. 18-35421 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Eugster v. Littlewood

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN KERR EUGSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAULA LITTLEWOOD, Executive…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2019

Citations

No. 18-35421 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2019)