In English v. Brennan, the court reached the same conclusion, where the description was: "Beginning at the south-westerly corner of Flushing and Clermont avenues, running thence westerly along Flushing avenue twenty-five feet, thence southerly at right angles to Flushing avenue, seventy-nine feet nine inches to a point distant forty feet seven and a half inches westerly from the westerly side of Clermont avenue, thence easterly on a line at right angles to Clermont avenue, forty feet seven and a half inches, thence northerly, etc., to the point of beginning."

In English v. Brennan the court reached the same conclusion, where the description was: `Beginning at the southwesterly corner of Flushing and Clermont avenues, running thence westerly along Flushing avenue twenty-five feet; thence southerly at right angles to Flushing avenue seventy-nine feet nine inches to a point distant forty feet seven and a half inches westerly from the westerly side of Clermont avenue, thence easterly on a line at right angles to Clermont avenue, forty feet seven and a half inches, thence northerly, etc., to the point of beginning.

In English v. Brennan * * * the description was: `Beginning at the southwesterly corner of Flushing and Clermont avenues * * *.' In White's Bank, etc., v. Nichols * * * the grant * * * describes the granted premises as commencing at the intersection of the exterior lines of two streets * * *.