From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Engel v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1976
51 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

In Engel v. Aponte (51 A.D.2d 989), the moving plaintiffs were held bound by unappealed prior orders granting summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.

Summary of this case from Zuckerman v. City of N.Y

Opinion

March 8, 1976


In a conversion action, defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 16, 1975, which, inter alia, denied their separate motions for summary judgment, and (2) as limited by their briefs, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated April 10, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination. Appeal from the order dated January 16, 1975 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated April 10, 1975 reversed insofar as appealed from, motions granted, and complaint dismissed. Appellants are awarded one bill of costs jointly to cover both appeals. The failure of the plaintiff to appeal from a prior order of the Supreme Court which (1) granted summary judgment to defendant Matzner Publications, Inc., and (2) granted defendant Aponte's motion to dismiss the complaint therein, with prejudice, bars further litigation of the same facts. Until reversed, an order granting summary judgment is as conclusively determinative of all issues in a case as is a judgment after trial (Klein v Gruss Son, 18 A.D.2d 1085). Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Engel v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1976
51 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

In Engel v. Aponte (51 A.D.2d 989), the moving plaintiffs were held bound by unappealed prior orders granting summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.

Summary of this case from Zuckerman v. City of N.Y
Case details for

Engel v. Aponte

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN ENGEL, Respondent, v. HUMBERTO APONTE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Zuckerman v. City of N.Y

The remedy is to move to vacate the default. In Engel v. Aponte ( 51 A.D.2d 989), the moving plaintiffs were…

Sachaleli v. Zdrazil

The March 2014 order awarded the plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability against each of the…