From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisele v. C. I. R

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 17, 1978
580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978)

Summary

In Eisele v. Commissioner, 580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978), this court, in a half-page per curiam opinion, affirmed dismissal by the Tax Court pursuant to Rule 104, noting simply that the dismissal is "explicitly authorized" by the rules.

Summary of this case from Oelze v. C.I.R

Opinion

No. 78-1237 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

September 21, 1978. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1978.

Robert C. Eisele, pro se.

Rita J. Eisele, pro se.

M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Act. Chief, Stuart E. Seigel, Act. Chief Counsel, Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Before GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH and HILL, Circuit Judges.



Petitioner Robert Eisele filed a petition with the Tax Court on June 4, 1976 seeking relief from the Internal Revenue Service's determination on March 29, 1976 that Eisele in the 1973 taxable year owed additional income taxes in the amount of $14,031.79 and a penalty of $701.59. The Internal Revenue Service then sought discovery of records relating to the deductions claimed by Eisele. Eisele, claiming that these records were privileged under the fifth amendment, refused to produce them. On May 25, 1977, the Tax Court determined that the records were not privileged and ordered Eisele to produce them on or before June 8, 1977. Despite this order, Eisele still failed to produce the documents. Accordingly, on June 17, 1977, the Tax Court dismissed the petition and ordered a judgment in favor of the Government.

The Tax Court's sanctions for failure to comply with discovery are explicitly authorized by Tax Court Rule 104(c)(3), which provides that the court may enter an order "dismissing the case or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party." We therefore conclude that the Tax Court's response to Eisele's continued refusal to produce the documents was proper.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Eisele v. C. I. R

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 17, 1978
580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978)

In Eisele v. Commissioner, 580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978), this court, in a half-page per curiam opinion, affirmed dismissal by the Tax Court pursuant to Rule 104, noting simply that the dismissal is "explicitly authorized" by the rules.

Summary of this case from Oelze v. C.I.R

In Eisele v. Commissioner, 580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978), the Fifth Circuit, in a half-page per curiam opinion, affirmed the dismissal by the Tax Court, noting simply that such action is "explicitly authorized" by the rules.

Summary of this case from Fox v. C.I.R
Case details for

Eisele v. C. I. R

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT C. EISELE AND RITA J. EISELE, PETITIONERS-APPELLANT, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 1978

Citations

580 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Steinbrecher v. C.I.R

In dismissing these taxpayers' cases and entering decisions sustaining the deficiencies in question, the Tax…

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

See H. Rept. 1337, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. A420 (1954); S. Rept. 1622, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 595 (1954). See also…