Summary
stating that the prior opinion "shall not be cited as precedent" unless adopted by the court en banc
Summary of this case from McAllister v. Adecco U.S. Inc.Opinion
No. 02-35536.
May 14, 2004.
D.C. No. CV-99-00536-HJF.
Kathryn Olson, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff.
Bradley F. Tellam, Esq., Robert Lane Carey, Barran Liebman, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Robert Steven Remar, Esq., Leonard, Carder, Nathan, Zuckerman, Ross, Chin Remar, San Francisco, CA, Harlan Bernstein, Esq., Jolles Bernstein, PC, Portland, OR, for Defendant.
Thane Walker Tienson, Esq., Copeland, Landye, Bennett Wolf, LLP, Portland, Richard A. Kasson, Kasson Paulson, Lake Oswego, OR, for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.