From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edward Smith and Company v. Van Houten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Summary

In Smith v. Van Houten, 9 N.J.L. 381, it was there decided that if a defendant would take advantage of the infancy of the plaintiff suing alone, the proper mode of raising the objection, in courts proceeding, according to the course at common law, is by plea in abatement; and upon the fact of infancy appearing, the justice of the peace before whom the case was tried might have admitted a guardian for the plaintiff or should have dismissed the suit.

Summary of this case from Commercial Credit Corp. v. Boyko

Opinion

June Term, 1897.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion


Summaries of

Edward Smith and Company v. Van Houten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

In Smith v. Van Houten, 9 N.J.L. 381, it was there decided that if a defendant would take advantage of the infancy of the plaintiff suing alone, the proper mode of raising the objection, in courts proceeding, according to the course at common law, is by plea in abatement; and upon the fact of infancy appearing, the justice of the peace before whom the case was tried might have admitted a guardian for the plaintiff or should have dismissed the suit.

Summary of this case from Commercial Credit Corp. v. Boyko
Case details for

Edward Smith and Company v. Van Houten

Case Details

Full title:Edward Smith and Company, Appellant, v. Erastus Van Houten et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1897

Citations

19 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Citing Cases

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Boyko

In Cowell v. Oxford, 6 N.J.L. 432, in an action of debt against an executor to recover the amount of a legacy…