holding that administrative agency's interest in HIV testing of employees who work with mentally retarded persons was not justified "[b]ecause the risk of disease transmission has been shown to be negligible" in circumstances of employment
Summary of this case from State in Interest of J.GNo. 88-1805.
October 30, 1989, October TERM, 1989.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 867 F. 2d 461.
holding that administrative agency's interest in HIV testing of employees who work with mentally retarded persons was not justified "[b]ecause the risk of disease transmission has been shown to be negligible" in circumstances of employment
Summary of this case from State in Interest of J.Gfinding no Sixth Amendment violation where a wife invoked her spousal privilege but her out-of-court statements were admitted against the defendant-spouse as a residual hearsay exception
Summary of this case from Tejeda v. StateFull title:EASTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY OFFICE OF RETARDATION ET AL. v. GLOVER ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 30, 1989
rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1059 (1990); Anonymous Fireman v. Willoughby, 779 F. Supp. 402 (N.D. Ohio 1991);…
Craig v. StateWe noted in Routly that under Giglio and Bagley, "the prosecutor has a duty to correct testimony he or she…