Summary
In East Diamond Head Ass'n v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 52 Haw. 518, 479 P.2d 796 (1971), for example, the Hawai'i Supreme Court held that owners whose property adjoined a parcel of land for which a zoning variance had been granted by a county zoning board of appeals (the zoning board), thereby allowing the parcel to be used for a movie studio, were "person[s] aggrieved" under HRS § 91-14(a) (1968) and "must be afforded judicial review should [they be found to have] comported with all other necessary administrative procedures at the lower level."
Summary of this case from Lounge v. Liquor Com'nOpinion
No. 4952.
March 4, 1971.
RICHARDSON, C.J., ABE, LEVINSON, KOBAYASHI, JJ., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE KABUTAN IN PLACE OF MARUMOTO, J., DISQUALIFIED.
Arthur S.K. Fong for the petition.
The petition for rehearing is denied without argument.
Circuit Judge Kabutan, who dissented from the majority in the original opinion, is now deceased.