From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EALY v. SHULTE

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 31, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-98.

March 31, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion of state court remedies.


Summaries of

EALY v. SHULTE

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 31, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

EALY v. SHULTE

Case Details

Full title:LARRY E. EALY, Plaintiff, v. DR. JEROME SHULTE Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

EALY v. CHIEF CLINICAL OFFICER

See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. §…