From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. Sherman v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 12, 1957
240 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1957)

Summary

affirming D.C., 141 F. Supp. 369

Summary of this case from Halstead v. C.I.R

Opinion

No. 12037.

Argued January 22, 1957.

Decided February 12, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Stephen B. Narin, Philadelphia, Pa. (Leon Ehrlich, Ehrlich, Narin Garfinkel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Davis W. Morton, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, I. Henry Kutz, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for the United States.


An examination of the briefs of the parties and consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed on the careful findings and opinion of Judge Kraft, D.C. E.D.Pa. 1956, 141 F. Supp. 369.


Summaries of

E. Sherman v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 12, 1957
240 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1957)

affirming D.C., 141 F. Supp. 369

Summary of this case from Halstead v. C.I.R
Case details for

E. Sherman v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Jack E. SHERMAN, Harvey B. Sherman and Sarah Kotin, Appellants, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1957

Citations

240 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1957)

Citing Cases

Halstead v. C.I.R

(2) Since the taxpayer represented to the taxing authorities that the form of business he set up was an…