From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS v. LYLES LANG CONS

U.S.
Jun 6, 1955
349 U.S. 956 (1955)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

treating AEC management contractor as "independent contractor" not "agent of the government" in denying motion of the United States to intervene as a party

Summary of this case from United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Catalytic Const. Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 785.

June 6, 1955, OCTOBER TERM, 1954.

C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. James F. Dreher and David W. Robinson for the Lyles Lang Construction Co. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Paul A. Sweeney and Benjamin Forman for respondents in No. 762. Mr. Sobeloff for petitioner in No. 785. Reported below: 219 F. 2d 328.

Summaries of

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS v. LYLES LANG CONS

U.S.
Jun 6, 1955
349 U.S. 956 (1955)

treating AEC management contractor as "independent contractor" not "agent of the government" in denying motion of the United States to intervene as a party

Summary of this case from United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Catalytic Const. Co.
Case details for

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS v. LYLES LANG CONS

Case Details

Full title:E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS Co. v. LYLES LANG CONSTRUCTION CO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 6, 1955

Citations

349 U.S. 956 (1955)

Citing Cases

Washington Shores Homeowners v. Orlando

This Court has also held that it will not "substitute its judgment for that of the constituted authorities…

Wells Fargo Co. v. Wells Fargo Exp. Co.

Although it has not always been designated as such in the cases, there is much authority for such a "general…

38 Citing Cases