From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dupueton v. U.S.

U.S.
Jan 24, 2005
543 U.S. 1098 (2005)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming the district court's judgment and noting that the district court stated “while subjectivity in the grading process may justify some variation in grading, this subjectivity factor cannot account for the huge differential in the grading and value of the coins.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Romano
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 04-244.

January 24, 2005.

C.A. 2d Cir.Reported below: 368 F. 3d 880; Certiorari Granted — Reversed and Remanded, for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.

Summaries of

Dupueton v. U.S.

U.S.
Jan 24, 2005
543 U.S. 1098 (2005)

affirming the district court's judgment and noting that the district court stated “while subjectivity in the grading process may justify some variation in grading, this subjectivity factor cannot account for the huge differential in the grading and value of the coins.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Romano

remanding for further consideration of the sentence following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621

Summary of this case from Du Purton v. United States
Case details for

Dupueton v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DUPUETON v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 24, 2005

Citations

543 U.S. 1098 (2005)
125 S. Ct. 991

Citing Cases

United States v. Romano

) Swiatek has served as an expert in another case involving criminal prosecution for mail fraud relating to…

Du Purton v. United States

United States v. Numisgroup Int’l Corp., 368 F.3d 880, 880 (2d Cir. 2004) (per curiam), cert. granted,…

2 Citing Cases